Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 77, P42-50, April 2023

A Scaffolded Simulation Curriculum: Translating Simulation with Standardized Patient Encounters into Clinical Practice for Nurse Practitioner Students

Published:March 02, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2023.02.004

      Highlights

      • Findings support the use of scaffolded simulation in nurse practitioner education.
      • Structured debriefing is essential translating knowledge to clinical practice.
      • Multiple sources of feedback advance formational learning.
      • Three themes emerged: authenticity, confidence, and harmonization.
      • Develop tools to evaluate competency acquisition through simulation.

      Abstract

      Background

      More high-quality research is needed to connect learning in simulation to clinical practice experiences of advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) students. The purpose of this study was to evaluate students’ perceptions of simulation and explore qualitative reflections about the role of simulation in preparing them for clinical practicum experiences.

      Methods

      In this longitudinal, mixed methods study, a series of six, scaffolded simulation experiences were implemented in an APRN curriculum. Focus groups were conducted with a convenience sample of 23 nurse practitioner students.

      Results

      Three key, interconnected themes emerged from the focus groups: authenticity, confidence, and harmonization. Quantitative data demonstrated that simulation was effective in promoting clinical decision-making skills.

      Conclusions

      The findings of this study support the use of scaffolded simulation experiences in nurse practitioner education. The participants valued the knowledge, skills, and confidence gained through the simulation experiences that included a standardized patient, multi-modal feedback, and a debriefing process. Students’ knowledge and behaviors learned through simulation experiences were transferred into their clinical practice.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Simulation In Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Aebersold M.
        Simulation-based learning: No longer a novelty in undergraduate education.
        OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 2018; 23https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol23No02PPT39
      1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2021, April 6). The Essentials: Core competencies for professional nursing education. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/42/AcademicNursing/pdf/Essentials-2021.pdf

        • Cheng A.
        • Grant V.
        • Robinson T.
        • Catena H.
        • Lachapelle K.
        • Kim J.
        • Eppich W.
        The promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) approach to health care debriefing: A faculty development guide.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2016; 12 (…&): 419-428https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.05.002
        • Decker S.
        • Alinier G.
        • Crawford S.B.
        • Gordon R.M.
        • Jenkins D.
        • Wilson C.
        Healthcare simulation standards of best practice: The debriefing process.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021; 58: 27-32https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.011
        • Fleming M.
        • Olsen D.
        • Stathes H.
        • Boteler L.
        • Grossberg P.
        • Pfeifer J.
        Virtual reality skills training for health care professionals in alcohol screening and brief intervention.
        Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2009; 22 (… Skochelak, S): 387-398https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2009.04.080208
        • Gasko J.
        • Johnson A.
        • Sherner J.
        • Craig J.
        • Gegel B.
        • Burgert J.
        • Franzen T.
        Effects of using simulation versus CD-ROM in the performance of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.
        AANA Journal. 2012; 80: S56-S59
        • Hickey M.T.
        Objective structured clinical examinations as a method of competency evaluation in a primary care nurse practitioner program.
        Nurse Educator. 2021; 46: 317-321https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000951
        • Hodges A.L.
        • Konicki A.J.
        • Talley M.H.
        • Bordelon C.J.
        • Holland A.C.
        • Galin F.S.
        Competency-based education in transitioning nurse practitioner students from education into practice.
        Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 2019; 31: 675-682https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000327
        • Holtschneider M.E.
        • Park C.W.
        Evaluating simulation education.
        Journal for Nurses in Professional Development. 2019; 35: 289-290https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000579
        • INACSL Standards Committee
        INACSL standards of best practice: Simulation facilitation.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2016; 12: S16-S20
        • INACSL Standards Committee
        Healthcare simulation standards of best practiceTM.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021; 58: 1-4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.018
        • Jeffries P.R.
        • Bigley M.B.
        • McNelis A.M.
        • Cartier J.M.
        • Pintz C.
        • Slaven-Lee P.W.
        • Zychowicz M.E.
        A call to action: Building evidence for use of simulation in nurse practitioner education.
        Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 2019; 31: 627-632https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000335
        • Kelly M.
        • Blunt E.
        • Nestor K.
        After-hours/on-call simulation in primary care nurse practitioner education.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2019; 26: 49-53https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.05.002
        • Kuszajewski M.L.
        • Vaughn J.
        • Bowers M.T.
        • Smallheer B.
        • Hueckel R.M.
        • Molloy M.A.
        Embracing disruption: Measuring effectiveness of virtual simulations in advanced practice nurse curriculum.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021; 57: 41-47https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.04.017
        • Leighton K.
        • Ravert P.
        • Mudra V.
        • Macintosh C.
        Updating the simulation effectiveness tool: Item modifications and reevaluation of psychometric properties.
        Nursing Education Perspectives. 2015; 36: 317-323https://doi.org/10.5480/15-1671
        • Lewis K.L.
        • Bohnert C.A.
        • Gammon W.L.
        • Hölzer H.
        • Lyman L.
        • Smith C.
        • Gliva-McConvey G.
        The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP).
        Advances in Simulation. 2017; 2 (): 10https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-017-0043-4
        • Navas-Ferrer C.
        • Urcola-Pardo F.
        • Subirón-Valera A.B.
        • Germán-Bes C.
        Validity and reliability of objective structured clinical evaluation in nursing.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2017; 13: 531-543https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.07.003
      2. National Task Force on & Quality Nurse Practitioner Education. (2016). Criteria for evaluation of nurse practitioner programs (5th edition). https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.nonpf.org/resource/resmgr/Docs/EvalCriteria2016Final.pdf

        • Nye C.
        • Campbell S.H.
        • Hebert S.H.
        • Short C.
        • Thomas M.
        Simulation in advanced practice nursing programs: A North-American survey.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2019; 26: 3-10https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.09.005
        • Nye C.
        State of simulation research in advanced practice nursing education.
        Annual Review of Nursing Research. 2021; 39: 33-51https://doi.org/10.1891/0739-6686.39.33
        • Paige J.T.
        • Garbee D.D.
        • Kozmenko V.
        • Yu Q.
        • Kozmenko L.
        • Yang T.
        • Swartz W.
        Getting a head start: High-fidelity, simulation-based operating room team training of interprofessional students.
        Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2014; 218 (): 140-149https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.006
        • Tiffen J.
        • Corbridge S.
        • Slimmer L.
        Enhancing clinical decision making: Development of a contiguous definition and conceptual framework.
        Journal of Professional Nursing. 2014; 30: 399-405https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2014.01.006
        • Urbanowicz J.
        The impact of an intentional APRN student clinical experience on role transition towards becoming a clinically competent practitioner; pilot study.
        Journal of advanced nursing. 2021; 77: 2050-2053https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14746
        • Verkuyl M.
        • Richie S.
        • Cahuas D.
        • Rowland C.
        • Ndondo M.
        • Larcina T.
        • Mack K.
        Exploring self-debriefing plus group-debriefing: A focus group study.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2020; 43: 3-9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2020.03.007
        • Woroch R.A.
        • Sefton M.G.
        • Yingling C.T.
        Using simulation to prepare for clinicals in front-loaded FNP curricula.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2020; 39: 45-50https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.11.002