Advertisement

Standardized Patient Simulation for More Effective Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Published:November 15, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2022.10.002

      Highlights

      • Clinical simulation is an increasingly vital part of clinical health care education.
      • Simulation allows for standardization of training experiences with patients.
      • SPS practice reduces the limitations of clinical practice for undergraduate nursing students.
      • SPS practice increases nursing students’ self-efficacy, communication skills, problem-solving and learning satisfaction.
      • SPS practice is more effective for nursing education than standard training alone.

      Abstract

      This systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to investigate the effects of standardized patient simulation on undergraduate nursing students following PRISMA guidelines. We searched seven databases; three reviewers independently performed study selection and data extraction and employed the risk for bias assessment for nonrandomized studies (ROBINS) tool to evaluate the quality of evidence. To estimate effect size, a meta-analysis of the studies was performed using STATA 16.0. We identified 1,276 related published studies; 68 met our inclusion criteria, 14 of which were eligible for final analysis. Our findings indicate that standardized patient simulation can effectively improve undergraduate nursing students’ communication skills, communication self-efficacy, self-efficacy, learning self-efficacy, problem-solving ability, and learning satisfaction; no evidence of publication bias was detected. Further studies are required to define detailed and standardized guidelines for supplementary research designs for experimental studies and effective methods of utilizing standardized patients. Expanding the application of evidence-based standardized patient simulation can improve reproduced clinical experiences and overcome limitations in clinical training for undergraduate nursing students.

      KEYWORDS

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Simulation In Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Becker B.J.
        Synthesizing standardized mean-change measures.
        British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 1988; 41: 257-278https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1988.tb00901.x
        • Calohan J.
        • Pauli E.
        • Combs T.
        • Creel A.
        • Convoy S.
        • Owen R.
        Using simulation in a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner doctoral program.
        Journal of Professional Nursing. 2016; 32: 458-462https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.03.009
        • Choi E.
        • Kwag Y.
        Nursing students’ problem solving, and clinical competence between standard patient and high-fidelity simulator simulation.
        Asia-Pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology. 2015; 5: 29-36https://doi.org/10.14257/AJMAHS.2015.04.27
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
        Academic Press, New York, NY1988
        • de Goh Y.S.
        • Selvarajan S.
        • Chng M.L.
        • Tan C.S.
        • Yobas P.
        Using standardized patients in enhancing undergraduate students’ learning experience in mental health nursing.
        Nurse Education Today. 2016; 45: 167-172https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.005
        • de Presno Å.K.
        • Øgård-Repål A.
        • Fossum M.
        Simulations with Standardized Patients for Nursing Students in Preparation for Clinical Placements in Mental Health Care.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2021; 54: 70-76https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.01.009
        • DerSimonian R.
        • Laird N.
        Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
        Controlled Clinical Trials. 1986; 7: 177-188https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
        • Doolen J.
        • Mariani B.
        • Atz T.
        • Horsley T.L.
        • O'Rourke J.O.
        • McAfee K.
        • Cross C.L.
        High-fidelity simulation in undergraduate nursing education: A review of simulation reviews.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2016; 12: 290-302https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.01.009
        • Fogg N.
        • Kubin L.
        • Wilson C.E.
        • Trinka M.
        Using virtual simulation to develop clinical judgment in undergraduate nursing students.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2020; 48: 55-58https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2020.08.010
        • Ha E.H.
        Undergraduate nursing students’ subjective attitudes to curriculum for simulation-based objective structured clinical examination.
        Nurse Education Today. 2016; 36: 11-17https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.05.018
        • Ha E.H.
        Experience of nursing students with standardized patients in simulation-based learning: Q-method study.
        Nurse Education Today. 2018; 66: 123-129https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.023
        • Hayden J.K.
        • Smiley R.A.
        • Alexander M.
        • Kardong-Edgren S.
        • Jeffries P.R.
        The NCSBN national simulation study: A longitudinal, randomized controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education.
        Journal of Nursing Regulation. 2014; 5: S3-S40https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30062-4
      1. Higgins, J. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: http://handbook.cochrane.org

        • Hung C.C.
        • Kao H.F.S.
        • Liu H.C.
        • Liang H.F.
        • Chu T.P.
        • Lee B.O.
        Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing students’ perceived competence, self-efficacy, and learning satisfaction: A repeat measurement method.
        Nurse Education Today. 2021; 97 (doi:)104725https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104725
        • Hustad J.
        • Johannesen B.
        • Fossum M.
        • Hovland O.J.
        Nursing students’ transfer of learning outcomes from simulation-based training to clinical practice: A focus-group study.
        BMC Nursing. 2019; 18: 53https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0376-5
        • Hyun J.S.
        • Kim E.J.
        • Han J.H.
        • Kim N.
        Effects of simulation-based education for emergency patient nursing care in Korea: A meta-analysis.
        Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science. 2017; 21: 1-11https://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2019.21.1.1
        • Joo G.E.
        • Sohng K.Y.
        • Kim H.J.
        Effects of a standardized patient simulation program for nursing students on nursing competence, communication skill, self-efficacy and critical thinking ability for blood transfusion.
        Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2015; 22: 49-58https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2015.22.1.49
        • Kang G.S.
        • Kim Y.
        Development and application of integrated-simulation practice program using standardized patients: Caring for alcoholism with diabetes mellitus in the community.
        Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 2016; 17: 662-672https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.8.662
        • Kim J.H.
        • Park I.H.
        • Shin S.
        Systematic review of Korean studies on simulation within nursing education.
        Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2013; 19: 307-319https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.3.307
        • Kim M.N.
        • Cho Chung.
        • H I.
        • Kim Y.A.
        A meta-analysis of the effect of simulation-based education for delivery nursing in Korea.
        Journal of the Korean Society of Maternal and Child Health. 2016; 20 (doi:): 297-309https://doi.org/10.21896/jksmch.2016.20.3.297
        • Kim S.
        • Ham Y.
        A meta-analysis of the effect of simulation-based education-Korean nurses and nursing students.
        Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2015; 21 (doi:): 308-319https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2015.21.3.308
        • Kim S.M.
        • Park M.J.
        • Yang Y.K.
        Effects on problem solving ability and learning satisfaction of nursing students of receiving a teaching method using standardized patients-blood transfusion.
        Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2015; 22: 406-415https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2015.22.4.406
        • Kim S.O.
        • Kim H.S.
        Effects of psychiatric nursing practicum using simulated patients on self-directed learning readiness, learning self-efficacy, satisfaction of learning.
        Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2014; 14: 396-408https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.02.396
        • Kim S.Y.
        • Park J.E.
        • Seo H.J.
        • Lee Y.J.
        • Jang B.H.
        • Son H.J.
        NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention (internet).
        National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul2011
        • Koo L.
        • Layson-Wolf C.
        • Brandt N.
        • Hammersla M.
        • Idzik S.
        • Rocafort P.T.
        • Tran D.
        • Windemuth B.
        Qualitative evaluation of a standardized patient clinical simulation for nurse practitioner and pharmacy students.
        Nurse Education in Practice. 2014; 14: 740-746https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.10.005
        • Kowitlawakul Y.
        • Chow Y.L.
        • Salam Z.H.A.
        • Ignacio J.
        Exploring the use of standardized patients for simulation-based learning in preparing advanced practice nurses.
        Nurse Education Today. 2015; 35: 894-899https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.03.004
        • La Cerra C.
        • Dante A.
        • Caponnetto V.
        • Franconi I.
        • Gaxhja E.
        • Petrucci C.
        • Lancia L.
        Effects of high-fidelity simulation based on life-threatening clinical condition scenarios on learning outcomes of undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9e025306https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025306
        • Lee H.J.
        Effects of convergence-based simulation education on the problem-solving ability, self-efficacy and performance confidence of core fundamental nursing skill for nursing students.
        Journal of Convergence for Information Technology. 2020; 10: 44-50https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2020.10.01.044
        • Lee J.
        • Oh P.J.
        Effects of the use of high-fidelity human simulation in nursing education: A meta-analysis.
        Journal of Nursing Education. 2015; 54: 501-507https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20150814-04
        • Lee S.J.
        • Park Y.M.
        • Noh S.M.
        The effects of simulation training with hybrid model for nursing students on nursing performance ability and self-confidence.
        Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2013; 25: 170-182https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.2.170
        • Liberati A.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Mulrow C.
        • Gøtzsche P.C.
        • Ioannidis J.P.
        • Clarke M.
        • Moher D.
        The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration.
        Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2009; 62: e1-e34https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
        • Lim K.C.
        Planning and applying simulation-based practice for the achievement of program outcomes in nursing students.
        Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2015; 21: 393-405https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2015.21.3.393
        • Luctkar-Flude M.
        • Wilson-Keates B.
        • Larocque M.
        Evaluating high-fidelity human simulators and standardized patients in an undergraduate nursing health assessment course.
        Nurse Education Today. 2012; 32: 448-452https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.011
        • McGaghie W.C.
        • Issenberg S.B.
        • Petrusa E.R.
        • Scalese R.J.
        A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009.
        Medical Education. 2010; 44: 50-63https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x
        • Morris S.B.
        • DeShon R.P.
        Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs.
        Psychological Methods. 2002; 7: 105-125https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.105
        • Mrayyan M.T.
        • Al-Faouri I.
        Predictors of career commitment and job performance of Jordanian nurses.
        Journal of Nursing Management. 2008; 16: 246-256
        • O'Donnell J.M.
        • Decker S.
        • Howard V.
        • Levett-Jones T.
        • Miller C.W.
        NLN/Jeffries simulation framework state of the science project: Simulation learning outcomes.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2014; 10: 373-382https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2014.06.004
        • Oh H.J.
        • Kim M.J.
        • Park K.M.
        The Impact of Nursing Students’ Learning Satisfaction on Motivation to Transfer in the Practicum of Psychiatric Nursing Convergence Simulation Using Standardized Patients: Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy in learning.
        Journal of the Korea Convergence Society. 2020; 11: 375-383https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2020.11.9.375
        • Oh P.J.
        • Jeon K.D.
        • Koh M.S.
        The effects of simulation-based learning using standardized patients in nursing students: A meta-analysis.
        Nurse Education Today. 2015; 35: e6-e15https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.019
        • Ok E.
        • Kutlu F.Y.
        • Ates E.
        The effect of standardized patient simulation before mental health rotation on nursing students’ anxiety and communication skills.
        Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2020; 41: 251-255https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2019.1642427
        • Schram A.P.
        • Mudd S.
        Implementing standardized patients within simulation in a nurse practitioner program.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2015; 11: 208-213https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.02.002
        • Shin H.
        • Ma H.
        • Park J.
        • Ji E.S.
        • Kim D.H.
        The effect of simulation courseware on critical thinking in undergraduate nursing students: Multi-site pre–post study.
        Nurse Education Today. 2015; 35: 537-542https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.12.004
        • Slater L.Z.
        • Bryant K.D.
        • Ng V.
        Nursing student perceptions of standardized patient use in health assessment.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2016; 12: 368-376https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.04.007
      2. Smithson, J., Bellingan, M., Glass, B., & Mills, J. (2015). Standardized patients in pharmacy education: An integrative literature review. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(6), 851–863. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.002

        • Webster D.
        Using standardized patients to teach therapeutic communication in psychiatric nursing.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2014; 10: e81-e86https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.08.005
        • Webster K.E.F.
        • Carlson E.
        Building therapeutic connections with the acutely ill through standardized patient simulation in nurse education an evaluation study.
        Nurse Education Today. 2020; 84104261https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104261