Advertisement

Clinical Virtual Simulation as Lifelong Learning Strategy—Nurse's Verdict

Published:August 11, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2020.06.012

      Highlights

      • The emergency nurses perceived ease of use of the CVS in their lifelong learning.
      • The emergency nurses perceived usefulness of the CVS in their lifelong learning.
      • The emergency nurses revealed an intention to use CVS in their lifelong learning.
      • The emergency nurses perceived that CVS acts as a facilitator in their lifelong learning.
      • The emergency nurses perceived CVS as an important complementary strategy in their lifelong learning.

      Abstract

      Background

      Lifelong learning in nursing is one of the main strategies to enhance quality and safety in nursing care. Technological advances have led to clinical virtual simulation (CVS) becoming a means of enhancing nurses' clinical reasoning skills within lifelong learning. However, little is known about nurses’ perceptions with regard to the ease of use and usefulness of CVS and their intention to use this technology.

      Aim

      The aim of this study is to assess the ease of use and usefulness of CVS and the intention of emergency nurses to use CVS to enhance their clinical reasoning skills in lifelong learning.

      Methods

      An exploratory, descriptive, and cross-sectional study was conducted using a quantitative approach. A nonprobabilistic sample of 131 emergency nurses was recruited from two Portuguese hospitals. The data were collected through a questionnaire (using a 10-point Likert scale) based on the technology acceptance model.

      Results

      The results showed an average of perceived ease of use of the CVS of 9.03, perceived usefulness of 9.14, and an intention to use CVS in lifelong learning of 8.85.
      The results also showed an average of 8.96 concerning the relevance of CVS and an average of 9.34 with regard to its role as a facilitator in lifelong learning in nursing.

      Conclusion

      CVS seems to be a strategy of great promise, as a novel approach in lifelong learning within the context of contemporary nursing.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Simulation In Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Davis D.
        A technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results.
        Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA1996
        • Davis F.D.
        Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.
        Management Information Systems Quarterly. 1989; 13: 319-339
        • Davis L.
        • Taylor H.
        • Reyes H.
        Lifelong learning in nursing: a delphi study.
        Nurse Education Today. 2014; 34: 441-445
        • Dee C.R.
        • Reynolds P.
        Lifelong learning for nurses - building a strong future.
        Medical Reference Services Quarterly. 2013; 32: 451-458https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2013.837741
        • European Commission
        Glossary: Lifelong learning.
        in: European Commission EUROSTAT - Statistics Explained. 2017 (Retrieved from)
        • Foronda C.L.
        • Fernandez-Burgos M.
        • Nadeau C.
        • Kelley C.
        • Henry M.
        Virtual simulation in nursing education: a systematic review spanning 1996 to 2018.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2020; 15: 46-54https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000411
        • Gordon R.M.
        • McGonigle D.
        Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education.
        1st ed. Springer Publishing Company, New York2018 (Chapter 1)
        • Heimann C.
        • Prado C.
        • Moraes R.R.
        • Vidal G.V.
        • Liberal D.
        • Oliveira G.K.
        • Barata M.V.
        Acquiring nursing knowledge through the constructivist method.
        Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013; 47: 997-1000
        • ICN - International Council of Nurses
        ICN Framework of Competencies for the Nurse Specialist. ICN Regulation Series. (S. -F. anesthésistes, Compilador) SIGA/FSIA - Fédération suisse des infirmières et infirmiers anesthésistes.
        (Retrieved from)
        • INACSL Standards Committee
        INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM simulation design.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2016; 12: S5-S12
        • Johnson D.
        • Flagg A.
        • Dremsa T.L.
        Effects of using human patient simulator versus a CD-ROM on learning the management of patients exposed to chemical agents.
        U S Army Medical Department Journal. 2010; : 9-16
        • Liaw S.Y.
        • Wong L.F.
        • Chan S.W.
        • Ho J.T.
        • Mordiffi S.Z.
        • Ang S.B.
        • Ang E.N.
        Designing and evaluating an interactive multimedia web-based simulation for developing nurses' competencies in acute nursing care: randomized controlled trial.
        Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015; 17: e5https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3853
        • Padilha J.M.
        • Machado P.
        • Ribeiro A.L.
        • Ramos J.
        Clinical virtual simulation in nursing education.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2018; 15: 13-18
        • Padilha J.M.
        • Machado P.
        • Ribeiro A.
        • Ramos J.
        • Costa P.
        Clinical virtual simulation in nursing education: randomized controlled trial.
        Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019; 21: e11529https://doi.org/10.2196/11529
        • Perkins G.
        Simulation in resuscitation training.
        Resuscitation. 2007; 73: 202-211
        • Roh Y.S.
        • Lee W.S.
        • Chung H.S.
        • Park Y.M.
        The effects of simulation-based resuscitation training on nurses' self-efficacy and satisfaction.
        Nurse Education Today. 2013; 33: 123-128
        • Tojal A.
        Perceção dos Enfermeiros sobre a Formação em Serviço (Master's Thesis, Nursing School of Coimbra).
        2011 (Retrieved from)
        • Tsai S.-L.
        • Chai S.-K.
        • Hsieh L.-F.
        • Lin S.
        • Taur F.-M.
        • Sung W.-H.
        • Doong J.-L.
        The use of virtual reality computer simulation in learning Port-A cath injection.
        Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2008; 13: 71-87
        • Venkatesh V.
        Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model.
        Inform Sys Res. 2000; 11: 342-365
        • WHO (World Health Organization)
        WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening.
        (Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Retrieved from)
        • Wilson-Sands C.
        • Brahn P.
        • Graves K.
        The effect of instructional method on cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill performance.
        Journal for Nurses in Professional Development. 2015; 31: E1-E7