Advertisement

Emerging Evidence Toward a 2:1 Clinical to Simulation Ratio: A Study Comparing the Traditional Clinical and Simulation Settings

Published:March 21, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.03.003

      Highlights

      • Students complete more activities in less time in simulation compared with the clinical setting.
      • Students spend more time in Miller's “knows how” (application) in simulation.
      • Students spend more time in Miller's “knows” (recall, not application) in the clinical setting.
      • Students spend more time in Miller's “does” (independent action) in simulation.
      • The efficient environment of simulation is emerging evidence toward a 2:1 clinical to simulation ratio.

      Abstract

      Background

      There is limited evidence comparing the clinical and simulation environments.

      Methods

      This multicenter observational study compared traditional clinical to simulation on the type, number, and level of educational activities as determined by Miller's Pyramid.

      Results

      Forty-two students' experience revealed that skills, physical assessment, teaching, and critical thinking activities occurred more frequently in simulation, with safety interventions more common in clinical. In addition, in simulation, students performed a greater percentage of activities in higher levels of Millers Pyramid, “Knows How”; 12.8% as compared with 8.6% in clinical, and “Does”; 66.3% as compared with 46.2% in clinical. Notably, the activities in “Does” were completed in approximately 1/5 of the time in simulation; 440 minutes, as compared with clinical; 2,137 minutes.

      Conclusion

      The intensity and efficiency of simulation was demonstrated through the completion of more activities in higher levels of Millers Pyramid in significantly less time than clinical providing emerging evidence toward a 2:1 clinical to simulation ratio.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Simulation In Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bell S.K.
        • Pascucci R.
        • Fancy K.
        • Coleman K.
        • Zurakowski D.
        The educational value of improvisational actors to teach communication and relational skills: Perspectives of interprofessional learners, faculty, and actors.
        Patient Education Counsel. 2014; 96: 381-388
        • Benner P.
        • Sutphen M.
        • Leonard V.
        • Day L.
        Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation (# 15).
        John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA2010
        • Berkow S.
        • Virkstis K.
        • Stewart J.
        • Conway L.
        Assessing new graduate nurse performance.
        Journal of Nursing Administration. 2008; 38: 468-474
        • Breymier T.L.
        • Rutherford-Hemming T.
        • Horsley T.L.
        • Atz T.
        • Smith L.G.
        • Badowski D.
        • Connor K.
        Substitution of clinical experience with simulation in prelicensure nursing programs: A national survey in the United States.
        Clinical simulation in Nursing. 2015; 11: 472-478
        • Cant R.P.
        • Cooper S.J.
        The value of simulation-based learning in per-licensure nurse education: A state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis.
        Nurse Education Today. 2017; 27: 45-62
        • DeVita M.A.
        Society for simulation in healthcare presidential Address, January 2009.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2009; 4: 43-48
        • Dunn W.
        Educational theory: Does simulation really fit?.
        in: Dunn W. Simulators in critical care and beyond. Society of Critical Care Medicine, Des Plains, IL2004: 15-19
        • Gaba D.
        The future vision of simulation in healthcare.
        Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2004; 13: 2-10
        • Harder N.
        • Ross C.J.M.
        • Paul P.
        Student perspective of role assignment in high fidelity simulation: An ethnographic study.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2013; 9: e329-e334
        • Hayden J.K.
        • Smiley R.A.
        • Alexander M.
        • Kardong-Edgren S.
        • Jeffries P.R.
        The NCSBN national simulation study: A longitudinal, randomized, controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education.
        Journal of Nursing Regulation. 2014; 5: 1-66
        • Hober C.
        • Bonnel W.
        Student perceptions of the observer role in high-fidelity simulation.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2014; 10: 507-514
        • Ironside P.M.
        • McNelis A.M.
        • Ebright P.
        Clinical education in nursing: Rethinking learning in practice settings.
        Nursing Outlook. 2014; 62: 185-191
        • Jayasekara R.
        • Smith C.
        • Hall C.
        • Rankin E.
        • Smith M.
        • Visvanathan V.
        • Friebe T.
        The effectiveness of clinical education models for undergraduate nursing programs: A systematic review.
        Nurse Education in Practice. 2018; 29: 116-126
        • Kaplan B.G.
        • Abraham C.
        • Gary R.
        Effects of participation vs. observation of a simulation experience on testing outcomes: Implications for logistical planning for a school of nursing.
        International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2012; 9 (Article 14)https://doi.org/10.1515/1548-923X.2398
        • LeFlore J.L.
        • Anderson J.
        • Michael J.L.
        • Engle W.D.
        • Anderson J.
        Comparison of self-directed learning versus instructor-modeled learning during a simulated clinical experience.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2007; 2: 170-177
        • Leighton K.
        Development of the clinical learning environment comparison survey.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2015; 11: 44-51
        • McNelis A.M.
        • Pamela M.
        • Ebright P.R.
        • Dreifuerst K.T.
        • Zvonar S.E.
        Learning nursing practice: A multisite, multi-method investigation of clinical education.
        Journal of Nursing Regulation. 2014; 4: 30-35
        • Miller G.E.
        The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance.
        Academic Medicine. 1990; 65: S63-S67
        • Oermann M.
        Reflections on undergraduate nursing education: A look to the future.
        International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2004; 9 (Article 5. Retrieved from)
        • O’ Regan S.
        • Molloy E.
        • Watterson L.
        • Nestel D.
        Observer roles that optimize learning in healthcare simulation education: A systematic review.
        Advances in Simulation. 2016; 1: 1-20https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-015-0004-8
        • Papathanasiou I.V.
        • Tsaras T.
        • Sarafis P.
        View and perceptions of nursing student on their clinical learning environment: Teaching and learning.
        Nurse Education Today. 2014; 34: 57-60https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.007
        • Pauly-O'Neill S.
        • Cooper E.E.
        Addressing gaps in quality and safety education during pre-licensure clinical rotations.
        Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 2013; 3: 65-70
        • Pauly-O'Neill S.
        • Prion S.
        • Nguyen H.
        Comparison of quality and safety education for nurses (QSEN)--Related student experiences during pediatric clinical and simulation rotations.
        Journal of Nursing Education. 2013; 52: 534
        • Stegmann K.
        • Pilz F.
        • Siebeck M.
        • Fischer F.
        Vicarious learning during simulations: Is it more effective than hands-on training?.
        Medical Education. 2012; 46: 1001-1008
        • Thidemann I.J.
        • Soderhamn O.
        High-fidelity simulation among bachelor students in simulation groups and use of different roles.
        Nurse Education Today. 2013; 33: 1599-1604
        • Victor J.
        • Ruppert W.
        • Ballasy S.
        Examining the relationships between clinical judgment, simulation performance, and clinical performance.
        Nurse Educator. 2017; 42: 236-239
        • Yonge O.J.
        • Anderson M.
        • Profetto-McGrath J.
        • Olson J.K.
        • Skillen D.L.
        • Boman J.
        • Day R.
        An inventory of nursing education research.
        International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2005; 2 (Article 11.)