Advertisement
Featured Article| Volume 16, P40-47, March 2018

Triangulation of Multifactorial Assessment: Bringing Objectivity to Objective Structured Clinical Examination Evaluation

Published:December 16, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.10.009

      Highlights

      • The objective structured clinical examination evaluation rubric and quiz were designed to measure student performance.
      • Student's grade determined by rubric, quiz, and standardized patient feedback.
      • Triangulation allows for precision remediation.
      • Instruments also useful with preceptors and community partners.

      Abstract

      Background

      The objective structured clinical examination is a critical simulation tool used as the gold standard for assessing graduate health students' ability to perform clinically. Often these simulations use assessment/evaluation methods that can be subjective.

      Methods

      To minimize subjectivity, one graduate nursing program is triangulating student performance assessment by using case-specific quizzes, standardized patient feedback, and structured observation rubrics.

      Results

      Initial evidence finds this composite evaluation provides equitable feedback across cohorts, identifies students struggling didactically and adds precision to remediation.

      Conclusions

      Initial findings are suggesting that this approach offers an all-encompassing reflection of clinical and academic performance.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Simulation In Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Casey P.M.
        • Goepfert A.R.
        • Espey E.L.
        • Hammoud M.M.
        • Kaczmarczyk J.M.
        • Katz N.T.
        • Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Undergraduate Medical Education Committee
        To the point: Reviews in medical education—The Objective Structured Clinical Examination.
        American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009; 200: 25-34
        • Dong T.
        • LaRochelle J.S.
        • Durning S.J.
        • Saguil A.
        • Swygert K.
        • Artino A.R.
        Longitudinal effects of medical students' communication skills on future performance.
        Military Medicine. 2015; 180: 24-30
        • Gaba D.M.
        • DeAnda A.
        A comprehensive anesthesia simulation environment: Re-creating the operating room for research and training.
        Anesthesiology. 1988; 69: 387-394
        • Goolsby C.
        • Deering S.
        Hybrid simulation during military medical student field training—A novel curriculum.
        Military Medicine. 2013; 178: 742-745
        • Gordon M.S.
        • Ewy G.A.
        • Felner J.M.
        • Forker A.D.
        • Gessner I.
        • McGuire C.
        • Waugh R.A.
        Teaching bedside cardiologic examination skills using “Harvey”, the cardiology patient simulator.
        The Medical Clinics of North America. 1980; 64: 305-313
        • Harden R.M.
        • Gleeson F.A.
        Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).
        Medical Education. 1979; 13: 41-54
        • Hodges B.
        Validity and the OSCE.
        Medical Teacher. 2003; 25: 250-254
        • Lejonqvist G.-B.
        • Eriksson K.
        • Meretoja R.
        Evaluating clinical competence during nursing education: A comprehensive integrative literature review: Evaluating clinical competence.
        International Journal of Nursing Practice. 2016; 22: 142-151
        • Margolis M.J.
        • Clauser B.E.
        • Cuddy M.M.
        • Ciccone A.
        • Mee J.
        • Harik P.
        • Hawkins R.E.
        Use of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise to rate examinee performance on a multiple-station clinical skills examination: A validity study.
        Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2006; 81: S56-S60
        • Newble D.
        Techniques for measuring clinical competence: Objective structured clinical examinations.
        Medical Education. 2004; 38: 199-203
        • Omu F.
        Attitudes of nursing faculty members and graduates towards the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).
        Open Journal of Nursing. 2016; 06: 353-364
        • Rushforth H.E.
        Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): Review of literature and implications for nursing education.
        Nurse Education Today. 2007; 27: 481-490
        • Sajid A.W.
        • Gordon M.S.
        • Mayer J.W.
        • Ewy G.A.
        • Forker A.D.
        • Felner J.M.
        • Elstein A.S.
        Symposium: A multi-institutional research study on the use of simulation for teaching and evaluating patient examination skills.
        Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education. 1980; : 349-358
        • Varkey P.
        • Natt N.
        • Lesnick T.
        • Downing S.
        • Yudkowsky R.
        Validity evidence for an OSCE to assess competency in systems-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement: A preliminary investigation.
        Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2008; 83: 775-780
        • Walsh M.
        • Bailey P.H.
        • Koren I.
        Objective structured clinical evaluation of clinical competence: An integrative review.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2009; 65: 1584-1595
        • Yudkowsky R.
        • Downing S.M.
        • Popescu M.
        Setting standards for performance tests: A pilot study of a three-level Angoff method.
        Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2008; 83: S13-S16