Advertisement

How Cultural-Historical Activity Theory can Inform Interprofessional Team Debriefings

      Highlights

      • CHAT foregrounds the role of context in work activities.
      • CHAT compliments established debriefing strategies.
      • CHAT offers a lens to explore social interactions in interprofessional teams.
      • CHAT-informed debriefing explores contextual factors that impact safe patient care.
      • CHAT-informed debriefing may help generalize learning to future clinical practice.

      Abstract

      Cultural–historical activity theory (CHAT) foregrounds context in work activities and provides simulation educators a valuable lens to view simulations and debriefings. CHAT offers a complementary conceptual framework when used in conjunction with established debriefing strategies. CHAT focuses attention on work activities as goal-directed social encounters and makes the activity system the basic unit of analysis. Activity systems include the individual(s) involved, their objective(s), and the tools/mediating artifacts used to achieve those objectives within contexts that contain rules, communities, and clear divisions of labor. CHAT may help simulation educators in a number of ways: (a) to reframe how they observe and interpret complex social interactions within team simulations, (b) to help identify and prioritize topics for debriefing, (c) to explore contextual factors promoting or impeding safe and effective patient care, and (d) to facilitate discussion beyond lessons from the concrete simulation event to generalize learning to future clinical practice.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Simulation In Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bleakley A.
        Broadening conceptions of learning in medical education: The message from teamworking.
        Medical Education. 2006; 40: 150-157
        • Bleakley A.
        Working in “teams” in an era of “liquid” healthcare: What is the use of theory?.
        Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2013; 27: 18-26
        • Bleakley A.
        • Bligh J.
        • Browne J.
        Medical education for the future: Identify, power and location.
        Springer Science+Busness Media B.V, Dordrecht2011
        • Bligh J.
        • Bleakley A.
        Distributing menus to hungry learners: Can learning by simulation become simulation of learning?.
        Medical Teacher. 2006; 28: 606-613
        • Bordage G.
        Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify.
        Medical Education. 2009; 43: 312-319
        • Brindley P.G.
        • Reynolds S.F.
        Improving verbal communication in critical care medicine.
        Journal of Critical Care. 2011; 26: 155-159
        • Cheng A.
        • Donoghue A.
        • Gilfoyle E.
        • Eppich W.
        Simulation-based crisis resource management training for pediatric critical care medicine: A review for instructors.
        Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2012; 13: 197-203
        • Cole M.
        • Engestrom Y.
        A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition.
        in: Salomon G. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge1993: 1-46
        • Cooper S.
        • Cant R.
        • Porter J.
        • Sellick K.
        • Somers G.
        • Kinsman L.
        • Nestel D.
        Rating medical emergency teamwork performance: Development of the team emergency assessment measure (TEAM).
        Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 446-452
        • de Feijter J.M.
        • de Grave W.S.
        • Dornan T.
        • Koopmans R.P.
        • Scherpbier A.J.
        Students' perceptions of patient safety during the transition from undergraduate to postgraduate training: An activity theory analysis.
        Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2011; 16: 347-358
        • Engestrom Y.
        Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research.
        Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki1987
        • Engestrom Y.
        Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work.
        Ergonomics. 2000; 43: 960-974
        • Engestrom Y.
        Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization.
        Journal of Education and Work. 2001; 14: 133-156
        • Eppich W.
        • Cheng A.
        Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): Development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2015; 10: 106-115
        • Eppich W.
        • Howard V.
        • Vozenilek J.
        • Curran I.
        Simulation-based team training in healthcare.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2011; 6: S14-19
        • Fanning R.M.
        • Gaba D.M.
        The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2007; 2: 115-125
        • Kessler D.O.
        • Cheng A.
        • Mullan P.C.
        Debriefing in the emergency department after clinical events: A practical guide.
        Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2015; 65: 690-698
        • Kim J.
        • Neilipovitz D.
        • Cardinal P.
        • Chiu M.
        • Clinch J.
        A pilot study using high-fidelity simulation to formally evaluate performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients: The University of Ottawa critical care Medicine, high-fidelity simulation, and crisis resource management I study.
        Critical Care Medicine. 2006; 34: 2167-2174
        • Kitto S.
        • Goldman J.
        • Schmitt M.H.
        • Olson C.A.
        Examining the intersections between continuing education, interprofessional education and workplace learning.
        Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2014; 28: 183-185
        • Kitto S.C.
        • Gruen R.L.
        • Smith J.A.
        Imagining a continuing interprofessional education program (CIPE) within surgical training.
        Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2009; 29: 185-189
        • Kolb D.
        Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development.
        Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ1984
        • Kolbe M.
        • Weiss M.
        • Grote G.
        • Knauth A.
        • Dambach M.
        • Spahn D.R.
        • Grande B.
        TeamGAINS: A tool for structured debriefings for simulation-based team trainings.
        BMJ Quality and Safety. 2013; 22: 541-553
        • Lave J.
        • Wenger E.
        Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.
        Oxford University Press, New York1991
        • Lingard L.
        Rethinking competence in the context of teamwork.
        in: Hodges B. Lingard L. The question of competence. ILR Press, Ithaca2012: 42-69
        • Lingard L.
        • McDougall A.
        • Levstik M.
        • Chandok N.
        • Spafford M.M.
        • Schryer C.
        Representing complexity well: A story about teamwork, with implications for how we teach collaboration.
        Medical Education. 2012; 46: 869-877
        • McDonnell L.K.
        • Jobe K.K.
        • Dismukes R.K.
        Facilitating LOS debriefings: A training manual.
        National Aeronautical and Space Administration, 1997
        • McGaghie W.C.
        • Issenberg S.B.
        • Petrusa E.R.
        • Scalese R.J.
        A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009.
        Medical Education. 2010; 44: 50-63
        • Mullan P.C.
        • Kessler D.O.
        • Cheng A.
        Educational opportunities with postevent debriefing.
        Journal of the American Medical Association. 2014; 312: 2333-2334
        • Mwanza D.
        Conceptualising work activity for CAL systems design.
        Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2002; 18: 84-92
        • Reeves S.
        An overview of continuing interprofessional education.
        Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2009; 29: 142-146
        • Rudolph J.W.
        • Raemer D.B.
        • Simon R.
        Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: The role of the presimulation briefing.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2014; 9: 339-349
        • Rudolph J.W.
        • Simon R.
        • Dufresne R.L.
        • Raemer D.B.
        There's no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2006; 1: 49-55
        • Rudolph J.W.
        • Simon R.
        • Raemer D.B.
        • Eppich W.J.
        Debriefing as formative assessment: Closing performance gaps in medical education.
        Academic Emergency Medicine. 2008; 15: 1010-1016
        • Schön D.
        The reflective practitioner.
        Basic Books, New York1983
        • Sharma S.
        • Boet S.
        • Kitto S.
        • Reeves S.
        Interprofessional simulated learning: The need for ‘sociological fidelity’.
        Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2011; 25: 81-83
        • Steinwachs B.
        How to facilitate a debriefing.
        Simulation Gaming. 1992; 23: 186-195
        • Swanwick T.
        Informal learning in postgraduate medical education: From cognitivism to ‘culturism’.
        Medical Education. 2005; 39: 859-865
        • Varpio L.
        • Hall P.
        • Lingard L.
        • Schryer C.F.
        Interprofessional communication and medical error: A reframing of research questions and approaches.
        Academic Medicine. 2008; 83: S76-81
        • Vygotsky L.S.
        Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes.
        Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA1978
        • Wolfe H.
        • Zebuhr C.
        • Topjian A.A.
        • Nishisaki A.
        • Niles D.E.
        • Meaney P.A.
        • Sutton R.M.
        • et al.
        Interdisciplinary ICU cardiac arrest debriefing improves survival outcomes*.
        Critical Care Medicine. 2014; 42: 1688-1695
        • Yamagata-Lynch L.C.
        Activity systems analysis method: Understanding complex learning environments.
        Springer, New York2010
        • Yamagata-Lynch L.C.
        • Smaldino S.
        Using activity theory to evaluate and improve K-12 school and university partnerships.
        Evaluation and Program Planning. 2007; 30: 364-380
        • Yardley S.
        • Teunissen P.W.
        • Dornan T.
        Experiential learning: AMEE guide No. 63.
        Medical Teacher. 2012; 34: e102-115
        • Zigmont J.J.
        • Kappus L.J.
        • Sudikoff S.N.
        The 3D model of debriefing: Defusing, discovering, and deepening.
        Seminars in Perinatology. 2011; 35: 52-58