Advertisement

Implementing Standardized Patients Within Simulation in a Nurse Practitioner Program

      Highlights

      • Creating ambulatory care simulation environment for primary care nurse practitioner student simulations can be challenging.
      • The students rated the debriefing experience as consistently effective at helping them to identify how to improve or sustain good performance.
      • Further research should focus on innovative, resource-effective strategies to use standardized patients within simulation for primary care nurse practitioner student teaching and evaluation.

      Abstract

      Background

      Nurse practitioner (NP) faculty need to think strategically about how to best implement simulation using standardized patients (SPs) for primary care NP courses. This pilot study sought to identify barriers and strategies to facilitate the use of SPs in a NP program.

      Method

      NP students participated in an ambulatory care simulation using a SP. Students completed the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH)© student version, short form, after the simulation.

      Results

      Students rated the simulation debriefing experience as effective in helping them improve or sustain good performance.

      Conclusion

      Although SPs portrayed a realistic ambulatory care environment, barriers are identified along with suggestions to overcome these barriers.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Simulation In Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • American Association of Colleges of Nursing
        The essentials of master's education in nursing.
        2011 (Retrieved October 22, 2014, from)
        • Association of Standardized Patient Educators
        (Retrieved from)
        • Austin E.
        • Hannafin N.
        • Nelson H.
        Pediatric disaster simulation in graduate and undergraduate nursing education.
        Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2013; (Retrieved from)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2012.12.004
        • Beckham N.D.
        Objective structured clinical evaluation effectiveness in clinical evaluation for family nurse practitioner students.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2013; 9: e453-e459
        • Bokken L.
        • Rethans J.
        • Jöbsis Q.
        • Duvivier R.
        • Scherpbier A.
        • Van der Vleuten C.
        Instructiveness of real patients and simulated patients in undergraduate medical education: A randomized experiment.
        Academic Medicine. 2010; 85: 148-154https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c48130
        • Brett-Fleegler M.
        • Rudolph J.
        • Eppich W.
        • Monuteaux M.
        • Fleegler E.
        • Cheng A.
        • Simon R.
        Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare development and psychometric properties.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2012; 7: 288-294https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182620228
        • Center for Medical Simulation
        Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare© (DASH©).
        (Retrieved from https://harvardmedsim.org/debriefing-assesment-simulation-healthcare.php)
        Date: 2014
        • Cook D.
        • Brydges R.
        • Hamstra S.T.
        • Zendefas B.
        • Szostek J.H.
        • Wang A.T.
        • Hatala R.
        • et al.
        Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2012; 308: 308-320https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182614f95
        • Cook D.
        • Hatala R.
        • Brydges R.
        • Zendefas B.
        • Szostek J.H.
        • Wang A.T.
        • Hamstra S.T.
        • et al.
        Technology-enhanced simulation for health professional education.
        Jounal of the American Medical Association. 2011; 306: 978-988
        • Dreifuerst K.
        Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation.
        Journal of Nursing Education. 2012; 51: 326-333https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20120409-02
        • Erby L.
        • Roter D.
        • Bieseckr B.
        Examination of standardized patient performance: Accuracy and consistency of six standardized patients over time.
        Patient Education and Counseling. 2011; 85: 194-200https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.005
        • Forsberg I.
        • Swartwout K.
        • Murphy M.
        • Danko K.
        • Delaney K.R.
        Nurse practitioner education: Greater demand, reduced training opportunities.
        Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 2015; 27: 66-71https://doi.org/10.1002/2327-6924.12175
        • Hamstra S.
        • Brydges R.
        • Hatala R.
        • Zendejas B.
        • Cook D.
        Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training.
        Academia Medicine. 2014; 89: 387-392https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000130
        • Hayden J.K.
        • Smiley R.A.
        • Alexander M.
        • Kardon-Edgren S.
        • Jeffries P.R.
        The NCSBN national simulation study: a longitudinal, randomized, controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education.
        The Journal of Nursing Regulation. 2014; 5 (Retrieved from https://www.ncsbn.org/JNR_Simulation_Supplement.pdf)
      1. Health Professions and Nursing Education Coalition. (n.d.). Funding Updates. Retrieved from https://www.aamc.org/advocacy/hpnec/

        • International Association for Clinical Simulaiton and Learning
        Standards of Best Practice I - VII.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2013; 9 (Retrieved from http://www.inacsl.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3407): s1-s32
        • Issenberg S.B.
        • McGaghie W.C.
        • Petrusa E.R.
        • Lee Gordon D.
        • Scalese R.J.
        Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review.
        Medical Teacher. 2005; 27: 10-28
        • Jeffries P.R.
        • Beach M.
        • Decker S.I.
        • Dlugasch L.
        • Groom J.
        • Settles J.
        • O'Donnell J.
        Multi-center development and testing of a simulation-based cardiovascular assessment curriculum for advanced practice nurses.
        Nursing Education Perspectives. 2011; 32: 316-322
        • Kurz J.M.
        • Mahoney K.
        • Martin-Plank L.
        • Lidicker J.
        Objective structured clinical examination and advanced practice nursing students.
        Journal of Professional Nursing. 2009; 25: 186-191https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2009.01.005
        • LeFlore J.
        • Thomas P.
        • Zielke M.
        • Buus-Frank M.
        • McFadden B.
        • Sansoucie D.
        Educating neonatal nurse practitioners in the 21st century.
        Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing. 2011; 25: 200-205https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0b013e318218137a
        • May W.
        • Park J.
        • Lee J.
        A ten-year review of the literature on the use of standardized patients in teaching and learning: 1996-2005.
        Medical Teacher. 2009; 31: 487-492https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802530898
        • McGaghie W.C.
        • Issenberg S.B.
        • Petrusa E.R.
        • Scalese R.J.
        A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009.
        Medical Education. 2010; 44: 50-63https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x
        • McWilliams P.
        • Botwinski C.
        Developing a successful nursing objective structured clinical examination.
        Jounal of Nursing Education. 2010; 49: 36-41https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20090915-01
        • National Heart Lung and Blood Institute
        National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel Report 3 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. 2007; (Retrieved from)
        • Ndiwane A.
        • Koul O.
        • Theroux R.
        Implementing standardized patients to teach cultural competency to graduate nursing students.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2014; 10 (Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187613991300162X#): e87-e94
        • Nuland M.V.
        • Noortgate W.V.
        • van der Vleuten
        • Jo G.
        Optimizing the utility of communication OSCEs:omit station-specific checklists and provide students with narrative feedback.
        Patient Education and Counseling. 2012; 88: 106-112
        • Pittman O.
        The use of simulation with advanced practice nursing students.
        Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 2012; 24: 516-520https://doi.org/10.111/j.1745-7599.2012.00760.x
        • Rosenzweig M.
        • Hravnak M.
        • Magdic K.
        • Beach M.
        • Clifton M.
        • Arnold R.
        Patient communication simulation laboratory for students in an acute care nurse practitioner program.
        American Journal of Critical Care. 2008; 17: 364-372
        • Rushforth H.
        Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): Review of literature and implications for nursing education.
        Nurse Education Today. 2007; 27: 481-490https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.009
        • Rutherford-Hemming T.
        • Jennrich J.
        Using standardized patients to strengthen nurse practitioner competency in the clinical setting.
        Nursing Education Perspective. 2013; 34: 118-121