Advertisement

NLN/Jeffries Simulation Framework State of the Science Project: Simulation Design Characteristics

      Abstract

      Background

      In 2005, Jeffries published “A Framework for Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Simulations Used as Teaching Strategies in Nursing,” which described the major constructs that were proposed to be core to the design, implementation, and evaluation of the evolving methodology of simulation-based education. In 2010, the NLN/Jeffries Simulation Framework (NLN/JSF) project was launched to review the current state of the science in support of the framework. A panel of simulation experts was assembled to review the literature for each of the framework constructs. This report summarizes the findings for the Simulation Design Characteristics construct. Within this construct, five key subcomponents are identified: objectives, fidelity, problem solving, student support, and debriefing.

      Method

      Literature citations and findings were abstracted into a standardized database to summarize findings. Preliminary findings were presented during the 2012 Annual International Nursing Simulation/Learning Resource Centers conference where feedback and perspective from session participants were solicited. The project team summarized findings from the literature review and commentary as well as identified areas for future research with respect to Simulation Design Characteristics.

      Results

      The project team found wide variance in the volume and strength of the evidence in support of the construct and its subcomponents. There is a general lack of an identified theoretical framework underpinning the majority of empirical simulation literature. Constructs and their subcomponents were found to be described in a varying array of terms. Within the Simulation Design Characteristics construct, supporting evidence is the greatest for debriefing and the least for objectives and student support. The volume or strength of the evidence in the literature does not appear to be in proportion to the relevance of each component to the framework.

      Conclusion

      Many of the concepts of the Simulation Design Characteristics appear to be widely discussed within the simulation community, even in the absence of significant volume and strength of supporting evidence. There is a need for standardization of terms and better description of constructs and methodologies reported in the simulation literature. There would appear to be numerous opportunities for future research to validate the role of Simulation Design Characteristics and learning outcomes. Utilizing and referencing the NLN/JSF in the design, implementation, and reporting of simulation instruction and research should bring better standardization and reproducibility to the process.

      KeyWords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Simulation In Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Alessi S.M.
        Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations.
        Journal of Computer-Based Instruction. 1988; 15: 40-47
        • Alfaro-LeFevre R.
        Critical thinking and clinical judgment: A practical approach to outcome-focused thinking.
        4th ed. Saunders, St. Louis, MO2009
        • Aronson B.
        • Glynn B.
        • Squires T.
        Competency assessment in simulated response to rescue events.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2012; 8: e289-e295https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.11.006
        • Bambini D.
        • Washburn J.
        • Perkins R.
        Outcomes of clinical simulation for novice nursing students: Communication, confidence, clinical judgment.
        Nursing Education Perspectives. 2009; 3: 79-82
      1. Barnett, J., Wong, W., Westley, D., Adderley, R., & Smith, M. (2011). Startle points: A proposed framework for identifying situational cues, and developing realistic emergency training scenarios. Proceedings of the 8th International ISCRAM Conference–Lisbon. Retrieved February 19, 2013, from http://www.iscramlive.org/ISCRAM2011/proceedings/papers/107.pdf

        • Benner P.
        From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice.
        Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA1984
        • Campbell D.M.
        • Barozzino T.
        • Farrugia M.
        • Sgro M.
        High-fidelity simulation in neonatal resuscitation.
        Pediatrics & Child Health. 2009; 14: 19-23
        • Cantrell M.A.
        The importance of debriefing in clinical simulations.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2008; 4: e19-e23https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2008.06.006
        • Cohen S.R.
        • Cragin L.
        • Wong B.
        • Walker D.M.
        Self-efficacy change with lowtech, high-fidelity obstetric simulation training for midwives and nurses in Mexico.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2010, September; 8: e15-e24https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.05.004
        • Cooper S.
        • Kinsman L.
        • Buykx P.
        • McConnell-Henry T.
        • Endacott R.
        • Scholes J.
        Managing the deteriorating patient in a simulated environment: nursing students' knowledge, skill, and situation awareness.
        Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2010; 19: 2309-2318
        • Cormier E.
        • Pickett-Hauber R.
        • Whyte J.
        Cognitions and clinical performance: a comparison of high and low performing baccalaureate nursing students.
        International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2010; 7
        • Davidson K.M.
        • Rourke L.
        Surveying the orientation learning needs of clinical nursing instructors.
        International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2012; 9: 1-11
        • Dieckmann P.
        • Friis S.M.
        • Lippert A.
        • Ostergaard D.
        The art and science of debriefing in simulation: Ideal and practice.
        Medical Teacher. 2009; 31: e287-e294
        • Dieckmann P.
        • Gaba D.
        • Rall M.
        Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2007; 2: 183-193
        • Dieckmann P.
        • Manser T.
        • Wehner T.
        • Rall M.
        Reality and fiction cues in medical patient simulation: An interview study with anesthesiologists.
        Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 2007; 1: 148-168
        • Dreifuerst K.T.
        The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: A concept analysis.
        Nursing Education Perspectives. 2009; 30: 109-114
      2. Durham, C., & Alden, K. (2008). Enhancing patient safety in nursing education through patient simulation. In Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses (Chapter 51). Retrieved February 19, 2013, from http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nurseshdbk/nurseshdbk.pdf

        • Endacott R.
        • Scholes J.
        • Cooper S.
        • McConnell-Henry T.
        • Porter J.
        • Missen K.
        • Champion R.
        Identifying patient deterioration: Using simulation and reflective interviewing to examine decision making skills in a rural hospital.
        International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2012; 49: 710-717
        • Fanning R.M.
        • Gaba D.M.
        The role of debriefing in simulation –based learning.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2007; 2: 115-125
        • Gaba D.M.
        The future vision of simulation in health care.
        Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2004; 13: i2-i10
        • Gillespie M.
        • Paterson B.
        Helping novice nurses make effective clinical decisions: The situated clinical decision-making framework.
        Nursing Education Perspectives. 2009; 30: 164-170
        • Gisondi M.A.
        • Smith-Coggins R.
        • Harter P.M.
        • Soltysik R.C.
        • Yarnold P.R.
        Assessment of resident professionalism using high-fidelity simulation of ethical dilemmas.
        Academic Emergency Medicine. 2004; 11: 931-937
        • Groom J.A.
        Creating new solutions to the simulation puzzle.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2009; 4: 131-134
        • Halaas G.W.
        • Zink T.
        • Brooks K.D.
        • Miller J.
        Clinical skills day: Preparing third year medical students for their rural rotation.
        Rural and Remote Health. 2007; 7: 1-10
        • Harris M.
        Simulation-enhanced pediatric clinical orientation.
        Journal of Nursing Education. 2011; 50: 461-465
        • Hertel J.P.
        • Millis B.J.
        Using simulations to promote learning in higher education.
        Stylus, Sterling, VA2002
        • International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Board of Directors
        Standard I: Terminology.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2011; 7: s3-s7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2011.05.007
        • International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Board of Directors
        Standard VI: The debriefing process.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2011; 7: s16-s17
        • Jeffries P.R.
        A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing.
        Nursing Education Perspectives. 2005; 26: 96-103
      3. Jeffries P.R. Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. National League for Nursing, New York2007
      4. Jeffries P.R. Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. 2nd ed. National League for Nursing, New York2012
        • Jeffries P.R.
        • Rizzolo M.
        NLN-Laerdal project summary report, designing and implementing models for the innovative use of simulation to teach nursing care of ill adults and children: a national multi-site study.
        National League for Nursing, New York2006
        • Kardong-Edgren S.
        • Lungstrom N.
        • Bendel B.
        VitalSim versus SimMan: A comparison of BSN student test scores, knowledge retention and satisfaction.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2009; 5: e105-e111https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.01.007
        • Kim J.
        • Neilipovitz D.
        • Cardinal P.
        • Chiu M.
        A comparison of global rating scale and checklist scores in the validation of an evaluation tool to assess performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients during simulated emergencies.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2009; 4: 6-16
        • Kim J.
        • Neilipovitz D.
        • Cardinal P.
        • Chiu M.
        • Clinch J.
        A pilot study using high-fidelity simulation to formally evaluate performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients: The University of Ottawa Critical Care Medicine, High-Fidelity Simulation, and Crisis Resource Management I study.
        Critical Care Medicine. 2006; 34: 2167-2174
        • Kneebone R.L.
        • Nestel D.
        • Vincent C.
        • Darzi A.
        Complexity, risk and simulation in learning procedural skills.
        Medical Education. 2007; 41: 808-814
        • Lafond C.M.
        • Van Hulle Vincent C.
        A critique of the National League for Nursing/Jeffries Simulation Framework.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2013; 69: 465-480
        • Langewitz W.
        • Heydrich L.
        • Nübling M.
        • Szirt L.
        • Weber H.
        • Grossman P.
        Swiss cancer league communication skills training programme for oncology nurses: an evaluation.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2010; 66: 2266-2277
        • Lapkin S.
        • Levett-Jones T.
        A cost–utility analysis of medium vs. high-fidelity human patient simulation manikins in nursing education.
        Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2011; 20: 3543-3552
        • Larew C.
        • Lessans S.
        • Spunt D.
        • Foster D.
        • Covington B.G.
        Innovations in clinical simulation: Application of Benner's theory in an interactive patient care simulation.
        Nursing Education Perspectives. 2006; 27: 16-21
        • Lasater K.
        High-fidelity simulation and the development of clinical judgment: Students' experiences.
        Journal of Nursing Education. 2007; 46: 269-275
        • Leighton K.
        Death of a simulator.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2009; 5: e59-e62https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.01.001
        • Maas N.A.
        • Flood L.S.
        Implementing high-fidelity simulation in practical nursing education.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2011; 7: e229-e235https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.04.001
        • Maran N.J.
        • Glavin R.J.
        Low- to high-fidelity simulation—A continuum of medical education?.
        Medical Education. 2003; 37: 22-28
        • Neill M.A.
        • Wotton K.
        High-fidelity simulation debriefing in nursing education: A literature review.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2011; 7: e161-e168https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2011.02.001
        • Nestel D.
        • Groom J.A.
        • Eikeland-Husebø S.
        • O'Donnell J.M.
        Simulation for learning and teaching procedural skills. The state of the science.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2011; 6: S10-S13
        • Pope C.
        • Mays N.
        • Popay J.
        Mixed approaches to evidence synthesis.
        in: Pope C. Mays N. Popay J. Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative health evidence. Open University Press, Berkshire2007 (pp. 95-114)
        • Ramer D.
        • Anderson M.
        • Cheng A.
        • Fanning R.
        • Nadkarni V.
        • Savoldelli G.
        Research regarding debriefing as part of the learning process.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2011; 6: S52-S57
        • Reischman R.R.
        • Yarandi H.N.
        Critical care cardiovascular nurse expert and novice diagnostic cue utilization.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002; 39: 24-34
        • Rodgers D.L.
        • Securro S.
        • Pauley R.D.
        The effect of high-fidelity simulation on educational outcomes in an advanced cardiovascular life support course.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2009; 4: 200-206
        • Rudolph J.W.
        • Simon R.
        • Raemer D.B.
        • Eppich W.J.
        Debriefing as a formative assessment: Closing performance gaps in medical education.
        Academic Emergency Medicine. 2008; 15: 1010-1016
        • Rudolph J.W.
        • Simon R.
        • Rivard P.
        • Dufresne R.L.
        • Raemer D.B.
        There's no such thing as “non-judgmental” debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment.
        Simulation in Healthcare. 2006; 1: 49-55
        • Salas E.
        • Burke C.S.
        Simulation for training is effective when ….
        Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2002; 11: 119-120
        • Salas E.
        • Wilson K.A.
        • Burke C.S.
        • Priest H.A.
        Using simulation-based training to improve patient safety: what does it take?.
        Joint Commission on Quality and Patient Safety. 2005; 31: 363-371
        • Shellenbarger T.
        • Edwards T.
        Nurse educator simulation: preparing faculty for clinical nurse educator roles.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2012; 8: 249-255https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.12.006
        • Sittner B.J.
        • Schmaderer M.
        • Zimmerman L.
        • Hertzog M.
        • George B.
        Rapid response team simulated training for enhancing patient safety (STEPS).
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2009; 5: e119-e127https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.02.007
        • Tanner C.
        Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing.
        Journal of Nursing Education. 2006; 45: 204-211
        • Vyas D.
        • Wombwell E.
        • Russell E.
        • Caligiuri F.
        Instructional design and assessment: High-fidelity patient simulation series to supplement introductory pharmacy practice experiences.
        American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2010; 74: 1-8
        • Waxman K.T.
        The development of evidence-based clinical simulation scenarios: Guidelines for nurse educators.
        Journal of Nursing Education. 2010; 49: 29-35
        • Waxman K.T.
        • Telles C.
        The use of Benner's framework in high-fidelity simulation faculty development: The Bay Area Simulation Collaborative model.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2009; 5: e231-e235https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.06.001
        • Wickers M.P.
        Establishing the Climate for a Successful Debriefing.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2010; 6: e83-e86https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.06.003
        • Wilson M.
        • Shepherd I.
        • Kelly C.
        • Pitzner J.
        Assessment of a low-fidelity human patient simulator for the acquisition of nursing skills.
        Nurse Education Today. 2005; 25: 56-67
        • Wilson R.D.
        • Haggler D.
        Through the lens of instructional design: appraisal of the Jeffries/National League for Nursing Simulation Framework for use in acute care.
        Journal of Continuing Education Nursing. 2012; 43: 428-432
        • Young P.K.
        • Shellenbarger T.
        Interpreting the NLN Jeffreis Framework in the context of nurse educator preparation.
        Journal of Nursing Education. 2012; 51: 422-428