Advertisement

Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Education in Critical Care Nurses' Continuing Education: A Systematic Review

Published:September 24, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2012.07.003

      Abstract

      Background

      The effectiveness of simulation-based education in nurses' continuing education is still largely unknown. The aim of this review was to assess the current body of literature regarding the effectiveness of simulation-based education in critical care nurses' continuing education, with a focus on knowledge and skills.

      Method

      We reviewed studies published between 2002 and 2011 contained in eight multidisciplinary databases (Ovid MEDLINE®, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, the Educational Resources Information Center, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Premier). Two researchers selected the studies and independently assessed their quality.

      Results

      Because of a lack of available studies, only one study is included in the review. According to the results of that study, simulation-based education increases critical care nurses' adherence to recommendations about safe medication administration, and thus it improves patient safety and the quality of care.

      Conclusion

      The effect of simulation-based education on critical care nurses' knowledge and skills is still questionable because of a lack of published studies and robust evidence. Further multicenter, randomized controlled trial follow-up studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of simulation-based education versus other educational interventions, as well as to develop a universal method for measuring the quality of outcomes.

      KeyWords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Simulation In Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Blackwood B.
        • Albarran J.W.
        • Latour J.M.
        Research priorities of adult intensive care nurses in 20 European countries: A Delphi study.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2010; 67: 550-562https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05512.x
        • Cant R.P.
        • Cooper S.J.
        Simulation-based learning in nurse education: Systematic review.
        Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2010; 66 (PMID: 20423432): 3-15
        • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination
        Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care.
        York Publishing Services, York, UK2009
        • Cronenwett L.
        • Sherwood G.
        • Barnsteiner J.
        • Disch J.
        • Johnson J.
        • Mitchell P.
        Quality and safety education for nurses.
        Nursing Outlook. 2007; 55 (PMID: 17524799): 122-131
        • Decker S.
        • Sportsman S.
        • Puez L.
        • Billings L.
        The evolution of simulation and its contribution to competency.
        Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 2008; 39: 74-80https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20080201-06
        • Ford D.G.
        • Seybert A.L.
        • Smithburger P.L.
        • Kubulinsky L.R.
        • Samosky J.T.
        • Kane-Gil S.L.
        Impact of simulation-based learning on medication error rates in critically ill patients.
        Intensive Care Medicine. 2010; 36 (PMID: 20300731): 1526-1531
        • Gaba D.M.
        The future vision of simulation in health care.
        Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2004; 13: i2-i10https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.009878
        • Jeffries P.R.
        A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing.
        Nursing Education Perspectives. 2005; 26 (PMID: 15921126): 96-103
        • Joanna Briggs Institute
        Critical appraisal checklist for cohort/case control appraisal.
        in: Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual. Author, Adelaide, Australia2008: 151
        • Kardong-Edgren S.
        • Adamson K.A.
        • Fitzgerald C.
        A review of currently published evaluation instruments for human patient simulation.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2010; 6: e25-e35https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.08.004
        • Kim J.
        • Neilipovitz D.
        • Cardinal P.
        • Chiu M.
        • Clinch J.
        A pilot study using high-fidelity simulation to formally evaluate performance in the resuscitation of critically ill patients: The University of Ottawa Critical Care Medicine, High-Fidelity Simulation, and Crisis Resource Management I Study.
        Critical Care Medicine. 2006; 34 (PMID: 16775567): 2167-2174
        • Lapkin S.
        • Levett-Jones T.
        • Bellchambers H.
        • Fernandez R.
        Effectiveness of patient simulation manikins in teaching clinical reasoning skills to undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2010; 6: e207-e222https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.05.005
        • Lupien A.E.
        High-fidelity patient simulation.
        in: Bradshaw M.J. Lowenstein A.J. Innovative teaching strategies in nursing and related health professions. 4th ed. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA2007
        • McGaghie W.
        • Issenberg S.
        • Petrusa E.
        • Scalese R.
        A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009.
        Medical Education. 2010; 44: 50-63https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x
        • McGowan J.
        • Samson M.
        Systematic reviews need systematic searches.
        Journal of Medical Library Association. 2005; 93 (PMID: 15685278): 74-80
        • Mellin-Olsen J.
        • Staender S.
        • Whitaker D.K.
        • Smith A.
        The Helsinki Declaration on patient safety in anaesthesiology.
        European Journal of Anesthesiology. 2010; 27 (PMID: 20520556): 592-597
        • Rall M.
        • van Gessel E.
        • Staender S.
        Education, teaching & training in patient safety.
        Best Practice & Research Clinical Anesthesiology. 2011; 25 (PMID: 21550549): 251-262
        • Santell J.P.
        • Hicks R.W.
        • McMeekin J.
        • Cousins D.D.
        Medication errors: Experience of the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) MEDMARX reporting system.
        Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2003; 43 (PMID: 12856391): 760-767
      1. Simerka, P. (2009). Council Recommendation of 9 June 2009 on patient safety, including the prevention and control of healthcare associated infections. Luxembourg: Council of the European Union, 9-6-2009. European Commission. Resolutions, recommendations and opinions. Retrieved July 27, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/health/patient_safety/docs/council_2009_en.pdf.

        • Solnick A.
        • Weiss S.
        High fidelity simulation in nursing education: A review of the literature.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2007; 3: 41-45https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.05.039
        • Zhang C.
        • Thompson S.
        • Miller C.
        A review of simulation-based interprofessional education.
        Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2011; 7: e117-e126https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.02.008
        • Zigmont J.J.
        • Kappus L.J.
        • Sudikoff S.N.
        Theoretical foundations of learning through simulation.
        Seminars in Perinatology. 2011; 35 (PMID: 21440810): 47-51