Clinical Simulation in Nursing
Volume 5, Issue 1 , Pages e9-e16 , January 2009

Nursing Faculty Perceptions of Obstacles to Utilizing Manikin-based Simulations and Proposed Solutions

References 

  1. Bantz D, Dancer MM, Hodson-Carlton K, Van Hove S. A daylong clinical laboratory: From gaming to high-fidelity simulators. Nurse Educator. 2007;32:274–277
  2. Curl ED, Smith S, Chisholm L, Hamilton J, McGee LA. Multidimensional approaches to extending nurse faculty resources without testing faculty's patience. Journal of Nursing Education. 2007;46(4):193–195
  3. Feingold CE, Calaluce M, Kallen MA. Computerized patient model and simulated clinical experiences: Evaluation with baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education. 2004;43(4):156–163
  4. Harlow KC, Sportsman S. An economic analysis of patient simulators for clinical training in nursing education. Nursing Economics. 2007;25:24–29
  5. Henneman EA, Cunningham H. Using clinical simulation to teach patient safety in an acute/critical care nursing course. Nurse Educator. 2005;30(4):172–177
  6. Herrmann EK. Mrs. Chase: A noble and enduring figure. American Journal of Nursing. 1981;81:1836
  7. Jeffries PR. A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2005;26(2):96–103
  8. Jeffries PR. Getting in S.T.E.P. with simulations: Simulations take educator preparation. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2008;29(20):70–73
  9. Jeffries PR, Rogers KJ. Theoretical framework for simulation design. In:  Jeffries PR editors. Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. New York: National League for Nursing; 2007;p. 21–33
  10. King CJ, Moseley S, Hindenlang B, Kuritz P. Limited use of the human patient simulator by nurse faculty: An intervention program designed to increase use. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 2008;5:1–17
  11. In:  Kohn LT,  Corrigan JM,  Donaldson MS editor. To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000;
  12. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1980;
  13. Lipson JG, Desantis LA. Current approaches to integrating elements of cultural competence in nursing education. Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 2007;18:10S–20S
  14. McLaughlin FE, Marascuilo LA. Advanced nursing and heath care research. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1990;
  15. Nehring WM, Ellis WE, Lashley FR. Human patient simulators in nursing education: An overview. Simulation & Gaming. 2001;32:194–204
  16. Nehring WM, Lashley FR. Current use and opinions regarding human patient simulators in nursing education: An international survey. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2004;25:244–248
  17. Seropian MA, Brown K, Gavilanes JS, Driggers B. Simulation: Not just a manikin. Journal of Nursing Education. 2004;43(4):164–169
  18. Spunt DL. Setting up a simulation laboratory. In:  Jeffries PR editors. Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. New York: National League for Nursing; 2007;p. 105–122

 Cite this article: Jansen, D. A., Johnson, N., Larson, G., Berry, C., & Brenner, G. H. (2009, January). Nursing faculty perceptions of obstacles to utilizing manikin-based simulations and proposed solutions. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(1). doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2008.09.004.

PII: S1876-1399(08)00045-5

doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2008.09.004

Clinical Simulation in Nursing
Volume 5, Issue 1 , Pages e9-e16 , January 2009

Article Tools